The US Supreme Court has ruled that abortion providers can sue to challenge a controversial Texas abortion law.
The law, known as SB8, gives people the right to sue doctors who perform an abortion past six weeks, before most women know they are pregnant.
In its ruling, however, the court said that the law can remain in effect, leaving it in place.
Doctors, women’s rights groups and the Biden administration have heavily criticised the law.
The divisive law – which came into effect on 1 September – bans abortion after what some refer to as a foetal heartbeat. The law makes an exception for cases of medical emergency, but not for rape or incest.
The American College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists says that at six weeks a foetus has not yet developed a heartbeat, but rather an “electronically induced” flickering of tissues that will become the heart.
The Texas law is enforced by given individuals – from Texas or elsewhere – the right to sue doctors who perform an abortion past the six-week mark.
At issue at the Supreme Court was whether two groups – Texas abortion providers and the federal government – can sue to block the law.
Friday’s ruling means that lawsuits from the providers can proceed. With the decision, the ruling will head back to the district court.
Once back in the district court, the providers will now be able to file for a stay of enforcement and ultimately challenge the law’s constitutionality.
In the meantime, the law will stay in place. The ban has led to a steep drop in abortions, experts say.
The US Supreme Court has ruled that abortion providers can sue to challenge a controversial Texas abortion law.
The law, known as SB8, gives people the right to sue doctors who perform an abortion past six weeks, before most women know they are pregnant.
In its ruling, however, the court said that the law can remain in effect, leaving it in place.
Doctors, women’s rights groups and the Biden administration have heavily criticised the law.
The divisive law – which came into effect on 1 September – bans abortion after what some refer to as a foetal heartbeat. The law makes an exception for cases of medical emergency, but not for rape or incest.
The American College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists says that at six weeks a foetus has not yet developed a heartbeat, but rather an “electronically induced” flickering of tissues that will become the heart.
The Texas law is enforced by given individuals – from Texas or elsewhere – the right to sue doctors who perform an abortion past the six-week mark.
At issue at the Supreme Court was whether two groups – Texas abortion providers and the federal government – can sue to block the law.
Friday’s ruling means that lawsuits from the providers can proceed. With the decision, the ruling will head back to the district court.
Once back in the district court, the providers will now be able to file for a stay of enforcement and ultimately challenge the law’s constitutionality.
In the meantime, the law will stay in place. The ban has led to a steep drop in abortions, experts say.
More Stories
Langya Virus Found In China: Symptoms, Spread And Other Details – 5 Points
Langya virus: A zoonotic virus Langya has been reported in China, with 35 people infected so far. The new type...
Sri Lanka Confirms Talks With China Over Deferring Visit Of Ship To Hambantota
India had expressed its security concerns over the docking of the vessel at Hambantota as it was shown as a...
Taiwan’s Military Drill Simulating Defence Against China Attack: Report
Lou Woei-jye, spokesman for Taiwan's Eighth Army Corps, confirmed that the drills had started in the southern county of Pingtung....
A Year After Taliban’s Return, Afghan Women Fight For Lost Freedoms
Afghanistan remains the only country in the world where girls are banned from going to high school. Kabul:Â Monesa Mubarez...
China Using Drills To “Prepare For Invasion”: Taiwan Foreign Minister
Taiwan had on Monday slammed China for conducting fresh air and sea drills around the island Taipei:Â Taiwan held an...
Sri Lanka President Calls For “Bilateral Agreement With Whoever We Want”
Sri Lankan President Ranil Wickremesinghe said, "There's too much of politics involved for there to be a regional trade agreement...